Urging Israeli-Palestinian talks, Obama backs down on settlements

At the UN Tuesday, Obama appeared to drop his demand that Israel freeze settlement growth as a precondition to negotiations by calling on it to “restrain” activity instead.

By Kristen Chick |
Christian Science Monitor Correspondent
09.23.09

Urging Israeli-Palestinian talks, Obama backs down on settlements

President Barack Obama may be dropping – or at least softening – his administration’s demand that Israel freeze settlement growth in the West Bank as a precondition to starting peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

That would mark a stark change for the administration, which had pressed Israel to declare a full freeze to all settlement growth in the West Bank to jumpstart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

Mr. Obama met with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday.

Officials from all three sides said after the meeting that Obama had abandoned the ultimatum he had given Israel, according to some news reports.

CNN reports that United States special envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell said the US is “not identifying any issue as being a precondition or an impediment to negotiation.”

Abandoning the terminology the US has been using in months of urging a halt to growth in the Israeli outposts on land claimed by Palestinians, Obama Tuesday referred to “restraining” settlement activity, rather than freezing it.

“Obama told Abbas that he couldn’t get the settlement freeze and promised to keep trying, but that it shouldn’t be a condition for talks and it was time to move on,” one Palestinian aide to Abbas said.

Several U.S. officials said that Obama told Abbas that although the U.S. believe a settlement freeze would create a better atmosphere for talks to begin, the lack of one should not be used an as excuse not to talk.

“Let’s not have the perfect be the enemy of the good,” Obama told Abbas, according to the officials.

The Los Angeles Times reports that White House officials say Obama’s position on settlements remains the same.

Administration officials insisted later that the U.S. position on Jewish settlements had not changed. But the shift in language was widely interpreted by Palestinians and Israelis as a sign the Obama administration was jettisoning a U.S. stance that had alienated many Israelis and their U.S. supporters.

About 300,000 Israeli settlers now live in 121 settlements in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since the 1967 war and where Palestinians hope to establish their future state. (Read the Christian Science Monitor’s briefing on where, when, and why Israeli settlements are built.)

It is unclear where this move leaves the possible peace negotiations. Mr. Abbas has so far refused to begin negotiations with Israel until it declares a full halt to the growth of the outposts. According to the conservative Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post, Netanyahu told Israeli reporters after the meeting that Abbas had dropped preconditions for the talks, and discussions were now focused on the framework of negotiations.

But Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said any move away from demanding a full freeze of settlements would impede the peace negotiations, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Obama had hoped to be able to announce a breakthrough in negotiations by now. Instead, he had to make do with the first meeting between Israeli and Palestinian leaders in a year. Reuters reports that the US and Israel may be pushing for entering full-blown negotiations before resolving the settlement issue.

“They are trying to finesse settlements now,” said [Daniel Kurtzer], a former U.S. ambassador to Israel. “Having been unable to reach an agreement to freeze settlements in a meaningful way, they are going to leave it out there as a disagreement between us but not as a road block or an impediment to negotiations.”

After the meeting Tuesday, Obama expressed determination to move forward, saying, “It is absolutely critical that we get this issue resolved,” the Monitor reported.

He … directed top foreign policy aides, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and special Mideast envoy George Mitchell, to continue the intense contacts with Israeli and Palestinian officials the US has pursued since Obama took office.

Mr. Mitchell said he would meet with his counterparts from both parties again Thursday, while Secretary Clinton is to report back to the president by mid-October on where diplomatic efforts stand.

Well, here it is. What I feared would happen is happening. Obama is showing his weakness and caving into Zionists demands which of course are aimed at torpedoing any real peace resolution between Israelis and Palestinians. Why do Israelis want to sabotage the peace process? Because it disallows them to keep taking more and more of Palestinian land for Israeli settlement building. Some day, Americans will get it, will wake up to what is really happening in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, that all along Zionists have had no intention of playing fair with Pals. Zionists want Greater Israel, i.e., as much territory of all Palestine, much of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq as they can get their hands on to reproduce the Jewish mythical Greater Israel of King David, a fabulously rich kingdom according to the Bible that archeologists curiously cannot find any trace of unlike the real ancient kingdoms of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Canaan. Zionists are making innocent people die for Jewish myths of origin. Let's hope Obama grow some cojones..