A potential $1.5 billion oil-for-goods swap between Iran and Russia has prompted harsh responses from Washington, which says such a deal could trigger new US sanctions.
Reports are emerging that Iran and Russia are in talks about a potential $1.5 billion oil-for-goods swap that could boost Iranian oil exports, prompting harsh responses from Washington, which says such a deal could trigger new US sanctions.
So far, talks are progressing to the point that Russia
could purchase up to 500,000 barrels a day of Iranian oil in exchange
for Russian equipment and goods, according to Reuters.
"We
are concerned about these reports and Secretary (of State John) Kerry
directly expressed this concern with (Russian) Foreign Minister (Sergei)
Lavrov… If the reports are true, such a deal would raise serious
concerns as it would be inconsistent with the terms of the P5+1
agreement with Iran and could potentially trigger US sanctions," Caitlin
Hayden, spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, told Reuters. (Related article: Syria Signs First-Ever Offshore Oil Deal, with Russia)
Russian purchases of 500,000 bpd of Iranian crude would lift
Iran's oil exports by 50% and infuse the struggling economy with some
$1.5 billion a month, some sources say.
Since sanctions
were slapped on Iran in July 2012, exports have fallen by half and Iran
is losing up to $5 billion per month in revenues.
In the
meantime, a nuclear agreement reached in November with Iran and world
powers is in the process of being finalized, and the news of the
potential Russian-Iranian oil swap deal plays to the hands of Iran hawks
in Washington who are keen to seen the November agreement collapse.
The November agreement is a six-month deal to lift some trade sanctions if Tehran curtailed its nuclear program. Technical talks on the agreement began last week.
Under
the terms of the tentative November nuclear agreement, Iran will be
allowed to export only 1 million barrels of oil per day.
In
mid-December, Iranian oil officials indicated that they hoped to resume
previous production and export levels and would hold talks with
international companies to that end.
This announcement sparked an immediate reaction from US Congress,
which has threatened oil companies with “severe financial penalties” if
they resume business with Iran “prematurely” following the six-month
agreement reached in Geneva.
There are plenty of figures in Congress—Republican and Democratic alike—who are opposed to the deal. The key “Iran hawk”
in US Congress, South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham, has described
the deal as “so far away from what the end game should look like”,
which should be to “stop enrichment”.
The opposition in
this case believes any talk between Tehran and Western oil companies is
premature because they are convinced that we won’t see a comprehensive
resolution after the six-month period, and that sanctions will be laid
on stronger than ever before.
No comments:
Post a Comment